{"id":3195,"date":"2015-12-14T18:21:00","date_gmt":"2015-12-14T18:21:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.emlitofnote.com\/?p=3195"},"modified":"2015-12-14T18:21:00","modified_gmt":"2015-12-14T18:21:00","slug":"nitrate-use-in-aortic-stenosis-nonsense","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.emlitofnote.com\/?p=3195","title":{"rendered":"Nitrate Use in Aortic Stenosis Nonsense"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This is another instance in which the \u201cEditor\u2019s Capsule Summary\u201d and my interpretation diverge significantly:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cThis study provides some support that nitrates do not cause relevant hypotension and may be judiciously used in patients with aortic stenosis and pulmonary edema.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Rather, as was the consensus last night at OHSU\u2019s journal club, these data provide essentially <i>no<\/i> support.<\/p>\n<p>These authors provide a retrospective regarding the incidence of \u201cclinically relevant hypotension\u201d, identifying three groups of patients presenting with acute pulmonary edema \u2013 severe, moderate, and no aortic stenosis. &nbsp;There were 65 patients in each cohort, and all patients received nitrates in either sublingual or intravenous form. &nbsp;Regarding their primary composite outcome, there was no difference between arms. &nbsp;Thus, the dogmantic avoidance of nitrates in aortic stenosis is challenged.<\/p>\n<p>I am quite enthusiastic, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/26215668\">as is Newman\u2019s editorial<\/a>, regarding the refutation of dogmatic (and erroneous) medical practice \u2013 he cites the example of the \u201cdangers\u201d of ketamine following head injury. &nbsp;However, these retrospective data are not of appropriately high quality to inform practice in the absence of stronger prospective or randomized, controlled trial data. <\/p>\n<p>The retrospective selection of patients only with prior discharges from the enrolling hospitals, as well as the inclusion of multiple presentations of some patients, likely amplifies selection bias with the effect of overstating the apparent safety of the intervention. &nbsp;The study is powered to 80% to detect a 20% absolute difference between arms, which certainly exceeds the clinically relevant safety margin when comparing outcomes between cohorts. &nbsp;The primary composite outcome for \u201cclinically relevant hypotension\u201d was mostly comprised of outcomes for which nitroglycerin needed to be terminated. &nbsp;Termination of potentially helpful therapy is not a patient-oriented outcome or even a physiologic surrogate for one. &nbsp;Sustained hypotension for &gt;30 minutes is a better physiologic outcome for judging potential adverse effects of nitrate use, and, finally, intubation or mortality are better clinical outcomes. &nbsp;The severe AS cohort had much higher incidence of these more serious outcomes, as opposed to the primary outcome in this study. &nbsp;Finally, as a catastrophic oversight, these authors fail to provide any sort of control group \u2013 there\u2019s no way to compare these patients\u2019 outcomes to any similar cohorts managed without nitrates.<\/p>\n<p>If you place this study in context with Ioannidis\u2019 \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/journals.plos.org\/plosmedicine\/article?id=10.1371\/journal.pmed.0020124\">Why Most Published Research Findings Are False<\/a>\u201d it is easy to see, rigorously, why these data should have little impact. &nbsp;This study is underpowered, replete with bias, and the pre-study odds \u2013 for what \u201ctradition\u201d is worth \u2013 speak against the safety of nitrates in aortic stenosis. &nbsp;Now, importantly, I am not saying you should <i>not<\/i> use nitrates in aortic stenosis \u2013 only, rather, doing so requires acknowledging the profoundly limited clinical evidence guiding such a strategy.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cComplications Associated With Nitrate Use in Patients Presenting With Acute Pulmonary Edema and Concomitant Moderate or Severe Aortic Stenosis\u201d<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/26002298\">http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/26002298<\/a><\/p>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\">Thanks to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ohsu.edu\/emergency\/education\/residency\/current-residents.cfm\">Ran Ran<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ohsu.edu\/emergency\/news\/spotlight\/sun.cfm\">Ben Sun<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ohsu.edu\/emergency\/education\/residency\/current-residents.cfm\">Kavita Gandhi<\/a> and the other OHSU residents for their excellent contributions to the discussion!<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n\n<div class=\"twitter-share\"><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?via=emlitofnote\" class=\"twitter-share-button\">Tweet<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This is another instance in which the \u201cEditor\u2019s Capsule Summary\u201d and my interpretation diverge significantly: \u201cThis study provides some support that nitrates do not cause relevant hypotension and may be judiciously used in patients with aortic stenosis and pulmonary edema.\u201d Rather, as was the consensus last night at OHSU\u2019s journal club, these data provide essentially &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.emlitofnote.com\/?p=3195\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Nitrate Use in Aortic Stenosis Nonsense&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3195","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cardiology"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7KesJ-Px","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.emlitofnote.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3195","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.emlitofnote.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.emlitofnote.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.emlitofnote.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.emlitofnote.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3195"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.emlitofnote.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3195\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.emlitofnote.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3195"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.emlitofnote.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3195"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.emlitofnote.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3195"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}